Double Marginalization Part II
... continued from Double Marginalization Part I
II. Double Marginalization: Retailer and Manufacturer both have monopoly power
Here, the monopolist retailer makes a profit by charging a higher retail price than the price demanded by the monopolist manufacturer:
P > PM
Profit for the retailer is given by:
∏ R = QD * (P – PM)
= (2480 – 174 P) * (P – PM)
= 2480 P – 2480 PM - 174 P2 + 174 P * PM
Profit for the retailer is maximized at:
∂∏R ∕ ∂P = 2480 – 174 * 2 P + 174 PM
or 174 * 2 P = 2480 + 174 PM
or P = (2480 / 348 ) + (PM / 2)
or P = 7.13 + (PM / 2)
Substituting this value of P in the demand curve results in:
QD = 2480 – 174 P
= 2480 – 174 ( 7.13 + PM/2)
= 2480 – 1240 - 87 PM
= 1240 - 87 PM
So, the profit function of the monopolist manufacturer is
∏M = QD * PM
= (1240 - 87 PM) * PM
= 1240 PM - 87 (PM)2
So, the manufacturer’s profit is maximized at:
∂∏M ∕ ∂PM = 1240 - 2 * 87 * PM = 0
or 174 PM = 1240
or PM = 1240 / 174 = $7.13
Thus, the retail price charged by the retailer to the final customer is given by
P = 7.13 + (PM /2)
= 7.13 + (7.13 / 2)
= $10.70
So, because of double marginalization, the final consumer pays a higher price of $10.70 compared to Case I above, where she had to pay only $7.13.
Now, let’s calculate the total channel profits.
The manufacturer’s profits are given by:
∏M = 1240 PM - 87 (PM)2
= 1240 * 7.13 – 87 (7.13)2
= $ 4418.39
The retailer’s profits are given by:
∏ R = 2480 P – 2480 PM - 174 P2 + 174 P * PM
= 2480 * (10.70 – 7.13)
- 174 * (10.70)2
+ (174 * 10.70 * 7.13)
= $2206.97
So, the total channel profits are given by
∏ = ∏M + ∏ R
= $ 2206.97 + $ 4418.39
= $ 6625.36
So, because of double marginalization, the total channel profits of $6625.36 are lower compared to Case I above, where the channel profits were $ 8838.76.